" the "other side" isn't interested in a resolution - " S2 #1,580
Even keystone State politicians aren't stupid enough to wade into a controversy without any reason."BREAKING
Pennsylvania’s Senate just voted..." S2 #1,578![]()
I can't offer a comprehensive list of their reasons.
But it doesn't take a rocket plumber to figure there was political pressure to address the issue.
Seems to me you're leaning heavily on the victim card here.
If you have what you perceive to be legitimate reasons for an alternate outcome, were those reasons considered before this vote?
If not, the weakness seems to be in lack of involvement.
If so, the weakness seems to be the strength of your argument.
It may seem I'm antagonistic to the cause.
I'm not.
I'm practical.
I think winning arguments should prevail.
If that has not happened here, why not?