Stop Project 2025

Shiftless2 said:
Read the comic and then vote
Click to expand...
- yikes -

Hyperbole, embellishment can have recognizable characteristics.

The presence of such characteristics may therefore present the appearance of exaggeration, hyperbole.

Not necessarily so.

Sometimes it's simple, unadorned radicalism.

= = =

The cartoons do raise some questions, apparently with alarming answers.

Are the destructive intentions of this extremist agenda being advanced by Americans, or al Qaida agents?

Shiftless2 said:
vote
Click to expand...
Good idea ! Election day, a week away.
 

Project 2025​

Before November it was a risk.
In the foreseeable future it's the agenda.
 

Gender, hiring, foreign aid: 3 ways Project 2025 is turning up in Trump's actions​

President Donald Trump distanced himself from the conservative project known as Project 2025 on the campaign trail, but many policies he’s choosing to enact already align closely with it.
Project 2025, led by policy experts at the conservative Heritage Foundation, has provided the Republican presidential administration with a blueprint of policy ideas.
“President Trump and his team deserve the credit for delivering on his commitment to make America safer, stronger and better than ever before,” said Ellen Keenan, a spokesperson for the Heritage Foundation. “We are thrilled to see President Trump follow through on so many of his campaign promises in just one week.”
www.usatoday.com

Gender, hiring, foreign aid:\u00a03 ways Project 2025 is turning up in Trump's actions

Candidate Trump distanced himself from Project 2025. President Trump is now enacting some of its conservative recommendations.
www.usatoday.com www.usatoday.com

January gone. The nation soon to follow?
 
Shiftless2 said:
Re the 14th Amendment we're hearing the right wing argue that the word "jurisdiction" in the Amendment really meant "Allegiance" #11
Click to expand...

@ link: ht tps://www.economist.com/united-states/2025/01/21/to-end-birthright-citizenship-trump-misreads-the-constitution​

Continue with a free trial​

Get full access to our independent journalism for free​

Free trial

I get the idea.
"Jurisdiction" is a geographically determined legal distinction.
"Allegiance" prerequires understanding sufficient to not merely impart agreement, but support.

a) The notion that a human being less than 60 seconds old (still wet) could manifest what would legally, Constitutionally qualify as "allegiance" is conspicuously preposterous. They don't even have the language skills to comprehend.

b) The word used in the Constitution is "jurisdiction". Even if they qualify as government officials, they do not have the authority to re-word the Constitution they're sworn to serve, to suit their own xenophobic bias.

Their assertion isn't even rational. Consider the wording as they pretend it to be:

ARTICLE#14: Ratified July 9, 1868
SECTION1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the "allegiance" thereof, are citizens ...

BUT !
Either way, they're still citizens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top